Freedom of Information: News

Transparency group that helped introduce UK FOI law faces closure

The Campaign for Freedom of Information has launched a crowdfunder to raise £50,0000 after ‘serious shortfall’ in funding

Jenna Corderoy
Jenna Corderoy
7 October 2021, 3.50pm
The campaign group played a key part in persuading Tony Blair’s government to introduce the FOI Act
|
Robert Harding / Alamy Stock Photo

A long-standing transparency campaign group may be forced to close down after a “serious shortfall” in funding.

The Campaign for Freedom of Information says it needs to raise at least £50,000 from crowdfunding, so that it can continue to fight against “more direct attacks” to the right to access information.

The campaign group, which was set up in 1984, played a key part in helping to persuade Tony Blair’s government to introduce the Freedom of Information Act in 2000. The act granted citizens the right to hold the government to account.

Blair later regretted allowing so much transparency, and famously called himself a “naive, foolish, irresponsible nincompoop” in his memoirs for introducing the Act.

Get dark money out of UK politics

Sign our petition to tell the government to tighten electoral laws and shine more light on political donations. We need to know who is giving what to our political parties.

For years, the Campaign for Freedom of Information (CFOI) has called for transparency legislation to be strengthened, and has helped the public challenge authorities when freedom of information (FOI) requests are rejected.

It recently urged the government to make a new £800m defence research agency subject to FOI legislation, preventing it from doing its work in secrecy. It has also raised serious concerns over the government’s substantial delays when answering FOI requests.

Speaking to openDemocracy, Maurice Frankel, director of the CFOI, warned of further threats to the right to access information.

“There are going to be more direct attacks on freedom of information, and every voice available that is capable of defending FOI needs to be there to defend it, because there’s absolutely no question that it will have to be repeatedly defended to preserve the right to access,” Frankel said.

Requests for information on COVID PPE contracts ‘are all stuck in the system’

In July, the campaign group revealed how the number of FOI complaints being referred to the UK’s information regulator had increased by 43% since the start of the pandemic.

Last November, openDemocracy found that the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), had seen its FOI budget cut by 41% in real terms over the past ten years.

Frankel said that the “pandemic backlog has made everything much worse” and that requests for information on COVID personal protective equipment (PPE) contracts “are all stuck in the system”.

He added that the new information commissioner, John Edwards, must ensure that FOI gets the attention and resources within the office: “It’s completely dwarfed by data protection at the moment.

“It is vital the ICO does not allow its attention to decrease still further away from FOI and in favour of data protection. It’s gone to an undesirable degree already in that direction.”

The CFOI found that there were 1,748 open complaints made by requesters, with the oldest being lodged in April 2019.

It also revealed that the Cabinet Office had the most ICO complaints against it, followed by the Department of Health and Social Care, the Ministry of Justice, and the Department for Work and Pensions.

Related story

Angela Rayner.jpg
Exclusive: Government accused of ‘misusing’ vast sums after openDemocracy revealed half a million pounds was spent on legal costs to fight information releases

The Cabinet Office has been consistently criticised for the way in which it handles FOI requests, as well as how it operates its controversial Clearing House unit, which instructs other government departments on how to respond to FOI requests.

The Clearing House was at the centre of a successful legal case brought by openDemocracy, which found there was a “profound lack of transparency about the operation”.

openDemocracy’s legal win has sparked a parliamentary inquiry into the Clearing House.

Empower and protect, don’t prohibit: a better approach to child work

Bans on child labour don’t work because they ignore why children work in the first place. That is why the International Year for the Elimination of Child Labour will fail.

If we truly care about working children, we need to start trying to keep them safe in work rather than insisting that they end work entirely. Our panelists, all advocates for child workers, offer us a new way forward.

Join us for this free live event at 5pm UK time on Thursday 28 October.

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email

Comments

We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData